Andy Gabele

• Why most schedule durations carry no traceable logic, making them difficult to defend or adjust as conditions change
• Why teams rarely get the chance to test real scheduling alternatives before committing to a plan
• Why risk tools flag problems but fail to model how to actually recover from them
• How extending the same rigor from the schedule into the field helps close the gap between the plan and daily execution

Practical Takeaway: Leave with a clearer understanding of how to make schedule assumptions more traceable, test alternative delivery options before committing to a plan, and use recovery modelling to move beyond identifying risk toward choosing practical actions that improve execution.